Agency Transportation Department

Contractor Collins Engineers, Inc

SWIFT Contract Number 246714

Project Name FY24 Enhanced Pier Caps

Project Number (if applicable) 1056082

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Metro District has over 770 bridges to complete routine inspections on each year to satisfy Federal and State statutory
obligations. Metro Bridge does not have the staffing to complete additional enhanced inspections of elements showing
structural deterioration and map the defects for analysis and structural evaluation.

Project Duration

Start Date Fri, 04/19/2024 - 00:00

Original end date Sun, 06/30/2024 - 00:00

Actual end date Sun, 06/30/2024 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? No

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $174923.11

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $174923.11

Did project finish within budget? No

What was the funding source? state funds

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) In order to comply with MnDOT and Federal regulations, all bridge inspections must be performed by MnDOT-certified Team
Leaders. There is currently a limited number of consultants with Team Leaders on staff with the ability to take on the work.

Evaluator Name Arseneau,Michael Bernard

Evaluator Email Address Michael.Arseneau@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness All field work was completed within the time constraints of the contract; however, some of the deliverables were pressed to the
very limits of the end of contract, with some items submitted after the final date. Though, all work was completed.

Evaluate the contractor's quality All deliverables were of very high quality and more than acceptable

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contract came in below budget, and the total number of bridges completed was well within the expected range.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance good

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): {Empty}

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied