Agency Corrections Dept

Contractor Ericksen Ellison and Associates, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 96190

Project Name Study and Document Review for Mold Remediation

Project Number (if applicable) 78WR0007

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Needed a study to determine HVAC contributions/solutions (interim and permanent) for mold remediation.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 07/20/2015 - 00:00

Original end date Wed, 09/30/2015 - 00:00

Actual end date Wed, 09/30/2015 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $4000.00

Amendments $0.00

Contract total $4000.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? CAPRA

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Within guidelines for emergency and single source - did previous study so process could be stream-lined for emergency work.

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied