Agency Corrections Dept

Contractor Ericksen Ellison and Associates, Inc.

SWIFT Contract Number 78923SHX

Project Name Add Offender Tracking System Study

Project Number (if applicable) 78923SHX

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Study of personal tracking system types and costs to evaluate the most cost effective devices that would perform in that particular MCF environment, to improve both inmate and staff safety.

Project Duration

Start Date Thu, 03/24/2011 - 00:00

Original end date Thu, 06/30/2011 - 00:00

Actual end date Thu, 09/22/2011 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $2000.00

Amendments $0

Contract total $2000.00

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? Agency (DOC)

Is this a sole source contract? Yes

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) Knew that EEA was famililiar with these specialty systems and anticipated fee was well within single vendor on Master Vendor List guidelines.

Evaluator Name Glen Heino

Evaluator Email Address glen.heino@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project. The agency received the Preliminary report in time for their needs.

Evaluate the contractor's quality Excellent – The Consultant performed in a better than average manner that demonstrating a good understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance outweighs any negative performance. The Consultant contributed a great deal to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's cost Satisfactory – The Consultant performed in an average manner that demonstrated an acceptable understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance is equal to any negative performance. The Consultant has contributed to the success of the project.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance Excellent – The Consultant performed in a better than average manner that demonstrating a good understanding of the owner’s requirements and contract requirements. The consultant’s overall performance outweighs any negative performance. The Consultant contributed a great deal to the success of the project.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): N/A

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 5 - very satisfied