Agency MNIT

Contractor SI Systems Recruitment Ltd

SWIFT Contract Number 243949

Project Name DOR Portfolio Management and Modernization

Project Number (if applicable) 16542889706

Summarize purpose of the contract, including why it was necessary: Lead the activities to design and implement a business and IT portfolio management and Governance process for the Department of Revenue. The work will include all aspects of the designing, defining, implementing and operationalizing the Governance and portfolio management process. The resource will also lead the implementation of a new strategic portfolio management (SPM) tool that will be used to track, manage and provide status of the organization's project and product portfolio. The SPM tool has been selected and is in the early stages of deployment. The completion of this scope of work will enable better decision making, work prioritization and a higher success rate for project and product work within the Department of Revenue.
This work and creation of a portfolio management process is necessary to manage, prioritize and coordinate project management work for the Department of Revenue.

Project Duration

Start Date Mon, 11/20/2023 - 00:00

Original end date Tue, 11/05/2024 - 00:00

Actual end date Tue, 11/05/2024 - 00:00

Did project finish on time? Yes

Total billable hours utilized (if applicable) {Empty}

Contract Amounts

Original contract: $245999

Amendments {Empty}

Contract total $245999

Did project finish within budget? Yes

What was the funding source? State

Is this a sole source contract? No

If this was a single source contract, explain why the agency determined there was only a single source for the services (if applicable) {Empty}

Evaluator Name Mark Hird

Evaluator Email Address Mark.Hird@state.mn.us

Evaluate the contractor's timeliness The contractor work and attendance was satisfactory and timely.

Evaluate the contractor's quality The contractor's work quality was satisfactory and met the requirements and objectives of the contract.

Evaluate the contractor's cost The contractor costs were reasonable.

Evaluate the contractor's overall performance The contractor's overall performance was good as the project met the objectives and requirements of the contract.

Would you engage the contractor's services again? Yes

Describe any negative action taken during the duration of this contract (i.e., termination, pursuit of suspension, etc.): n/a

Please rate the overall experience with the contractor 4 - satisfied